Patriarchy’s Rotten Fruit – pink and blue sets of spiritual armor

[From the archives.]

In 4 Ways to Overcome the Feminization of Boys, Owen Strachan wrote that the actions of the passengers who subdued a heavily armed gunman on a train traveling from Belgium to France (BBC – France Train Shooting: what we know) reminded him “of the duty we have to train boys to take risks and lead in self-sacrifice for the good of others.”

Mr. Strachan* says nothing about training girls to take risks and lead in self-sacrifice for the good of others, though. For him risk-taking and self-sacrifice are manly characteristics and Jesus is the one who set the example for men to follow in pursuing their risk-taking self-sacrificial lives:

He does no violence to the God-created nature of manhood. Instead, he redeems manhood, and channels to ends that glorify the Father. Men find in him the example they desperately want. They discover a warrior-savior who is so manly that he feels no insecurity over weeping over the death of his friend (John 11:35).

Jesus redeemed manhood? Mr. Strachan provides no reference to a Bible passage to support this claim. Then again he couldn’t, because there is no Bible passage supporting such a notion. After all, Jesus did not come to redeem manhood. Jesus redeems people. (Galatians 3:13-14, 1 Peter 1:18.)

Pink and Blue sets of Spiritual Armor

The main problem with Mr. Strachan’s spin on the train rescue is that the traits and characteristics he claims are specific to men are actually traits and characteristics the Bible shows in women as well. His unbiblical efforts not only don’t build up men in any way the Bible teaches but also serve to create vapid women if they accept his ways, as much as if he said: “Men, go out and take some risks! Oh, and you women should empty yourselves of any desire to be risk-takers and let manly men take those risks for you.”

The Bible has much more to offer women and men. For example, regarding Mr. Strachan’s reference to Jesus as a warrior we can look to Paul’s teaching on the armor of God and take note of the complete lack of gender/sex restrictions or distinctions.

For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. Therefore put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand. (Ephesians 6:12-13.)

Paul goes on to list the armor – the helmet of salvation, shield of faith, sword of the Spirit, and more. (Ephesians 6:14-17.) Nowhere does Paul say this armor is for men but not women, so if Jesus set an example as a warrior then it’s an example for both women and men in the kingdom of Christ.

Some might say, though, that the armor of God is for spiritual battles while Mr. Strachan is talking about physical action. First, spiritual and physical matters are not dichotomized in Scripture. They are intertwined and joined so that what we do is always part of spiritual reality. (E.g., see what Paul had to say about sexual intercourse and spiritual reality in 1 Corinthians 6:15-16.)

Second, we can look at Biblical examples of men and women who took action in various ways. David defeating Goliath might be the most famous example, but it’s not the only one. And sometimes men God acted in ways that had disastrous consequences.

Consider Lot, Abraham’s nephew. When the mob outside his house demanded “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them,” Lot went out to face the mob long enough to offer them his virgin daughters to “do what you like with them.” The daughters escaped only by the intervention of God. (Genesis 19.) Then there’s the Levite – a man set aside for service in the tabernacle of God – who sent his concubine out to another threatening mob. They raped her all night long, and she was dead by morning. (Judges 19.)

Lot and the Levite were decisive men, and their actions are horrifying.

Women of Action: examples for all men and women to follow

Lot and the Levite don’t stack up well against others in the Bible, but they look especially bad in comparison with women who took decisive action and were honored by God for it.

  • Zipporah – When her husband Moses was in danger of suffering God’s wrath, Zipporah grabbed a knife, circumcised their son on the spot, and saved Moses’ life, claiming him as her “bridegroom of blood.” (Exodus 4.)
  • Deborah – When Israel descended into a period of evil, Deborah answered God’s call to lead the nation, holding court to decide disputes among the people and mediating God’s will for the leaders of Israel’s army.** (Judges 4.)
  • Jael – When the general of the army attacking Israel fled for safety, Jael killed him by taking a mallet and driving a tent stake through his brain while he slept. (Judges 4.) Israel sang her praises. (Judges 5.)
  • Rahab – When the Israelites sent spies to scout the enemy in Jericho, Rahab hid them from the soldiers and sent them safely back to their own lines. (Joshua 2.) She is an honored ancestor of Jesus. (Matthew 1:8.)
  • Abigail – When David and his men traveled the countryside with no permanent camp as a base, Abigail provided everything they needed despite her husband’s refusal to help David and his army. (1 Samuel 25.)

These are women who took risks and led through self-sacrifice, and the Bible celebrates them all.

Mr. Strachan, on the other hand, would teach women not to do anything like these courageous acts and instead leave risk-taking sacrifice to men. I hope he’s not depending on men like Lot.

Following the Example of Women who Follow God

To say that the Godly examples of courageous faith these women gave us don’t count, to say that only boys should be trained to take risks, to teach that only men are meant to lead through such self-sacrifice – all of that is to deny Scripture itself and leads to vapid womanhood.

Yet it’s not women themselves who are vapid. What’s vapid is the rotten fruit of patriarchal doctrine. It’s so rotten, all that’s left is the stench lingering in the air.

But in Jesus, we have the sweet aroma of freedom to follow him and his ways regardless of whether you are a man or a woman. After all, Jesus did not come to redeem manhood so that men could lead women.

He came to redeem women and men for himself.


*Owen Strachan would call himself a complementarian and not a patriarchist. He teaches that when it comes to families, churches, and the world at large, men are to lead and women are to follow. That’s patriarchy.

**Some conclude the only reason Deborah became Israel’s leader is because no man would do it; no passage in Scripture supports that conclusion. To the contrary, God works through women the same way he works through men, by his choosing.


This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Patriarchy’s Rotten Fruit – pink and blue sets of spiritual armor

  1. I wonder if those who use the term “social justice warrior” to refer to passionate young women and men who speak up against injustices are mostly thinking of girls. I seeTumblr- a mostly-girl-used site, bashed in this way all the time. Sometimes I feel there are those who are threatened by powerful young women.

    In stead of seeing them as a threat, it’s time we harnessed that passion and energy, and taught our young women and men to embrace the gifts God has given them, tempering passion with wisdom and grace. It’s young people like my son and daughter who will break down these barriers and change the world. ❤

    -Mary, aka Life With Teens & Other Wild Things

    • Tim says:

      Good point about using SJW as a euphemism in an attempt to marginalize the efforts of young women and men, Mary. It can be discouraging to be labeled rather than understood correctly.

  2. Angie says:

    Tim, Strachan actually embraces the term patriarchy and acknowledges “complementarianism” is what was once called “patriarchy”. See for: “For millennia, followers of God have practiced what used to be called patriarchy and is now called complementarianism.” –Owen Strachan

    • Tim says:

      Good clarification. Thanks, Angie.

    • That French train example is frustrating. It says 3 of the rescuers were off-duty military servicemen; that training would have been the same if one (or all) of them was female. Should a trained serviceWOMAN hold back so that men can take over in such an instance? To hold these rare examples up before boys and encourage them to imagine themselves as “warrior-saviors” seems really unwise to me. There are many simple, humble ways to serve and sacrifice, and we are far more likely to face THOSE than we are to face life-or-death crises on trains. Teaching boys AND girls to use their gifts, step out in faith, and sacrifice in the everyday (not news-making) situations they face day-to-day makes a lot more sense to me.

      • Tim says:

        You show a lot more wisdom in this than Mr. Strachan, Jeannie. Whoever is in a position to help – man or woman – should help.

      • Pastor Bob says:

        Until recently, the men have been trained to a much higher standard. If I not mistaken, these were Marines, which again, until recently closed itself off from training woman for he intensive roles of combat. ALL marines are riflemen -the term has changed too -here emphasizing highly trained combatants. With 40% more upper body strength than women, it will be hard for women to reach that level of proficiency.

        However, that is not a justification for this “teacher’s” strange points. In the time locked principle of the “traditional” roles of the Bible, it is hard to reconcile a strict interpretation of this AND transplant it into today’s world. We need to understand not only the roles, but culture and custom of the day to understand SOME of the Bible lessons-teachings.

        Maybe another example of good intentions gone awry?

  3. Pingback: Patriarchy’s Rotten Fruit – pink and blue sets of spiritual armor – GBFSV SPIRITUAL ABUSE VICTIMS' RECOVERY

Talk to me (or don't)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.