Laws Worth Following

[From the archives.]


I recently finished Philip Yancey’s Rumors of Another World* where I found these gems:

… the average citizen of modern Europe perceives only one world, the here and now. She assumes that rational people make society’s rules based on a common good, not on any revealed or ‘natural’ law. (p. 164.)

The biblical view is at once more subtle and more connected. It presents reality as a seamless whole, with no neat divisions between sacred and profane or between natural and supernatural. There is only God’s world, a sacred world, which has been profaned by human rebellion. (p. 188.)

These two views, the spiritual and the secular (or, as Yancey puts it in more traditional terms, the sacred and the profane), have not just recently come into contrast of course. People have denied God’s existence almost from the beginning. In fact, I used to be of the same mind as Yancey’s hypothetical European

Yancey’s observations clearly display that acknowledgment of God – or lack of acknowledgement – affects  people’s understanding of law and legal theory. It’s that legal theory that comes into play in our understanding of God and his relationship with his creation.

Natural Law Theory

Natural Law theory holds that there is only one law, and that this law applies universally. The way this operated under English Common Law, for example, was that when a case was appealed to the high court the court’s justices would discern legal principles and then apply them to the case at hand. Sometimes, though, the court would later overrule itself, rejecting precedent set by earlier justices (or perhaps even their own decisions) and declaring the law to be different from what they had earlier decreed.

This is where it gets interesting.

The court would not admit that the law had changed. Instead they declared the earlier statement of the law to be error, and that their new statement was really what the law had been all along. It’s not a matter of old law and new law. It’s a matter of recognizing the Natural Law and getting it right.

That’s not how legal systems work now, at least not in most countries. Now we operate under the theory of Positive Law, meaning law posited by people in a particular society and not necessarily universally applicable. This leaves governments free to change laws as they see fit.

The Place for Natural Law

This does not mean that Natural Law is obsolete. We know that God’s law is the only true and eternal way to live. We also know that for those under the New Covenant it is a law of love:

Love does no harm to a neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the law. (Romans 13:10.)

For the entire law is fulfilled in keeping this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.” (Galatians 5:14.)

If you really keep the royal law found in Scripture, “Love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing right. (James 2:8.)

Even those who have not yet entered into this New Covenant still have God’s law written on their hearts. (Romans 2:14-15.) This too is a Natural Law, one that is universally applicable.

So for the modern person Yancey mentioned, whether they know it or not there is more to law than what is posited by people. As he points out, the Bible teaches a nuanced and subtly connected understanding of how the world is governed, one that recognizes no neat divisions between the spiritual and the secular.

There is only one world, after all, and no matter how we profane it it still belongs to our sacred and holy King.


*I won this book in a giveaway at Laura Martin’s blog, Enough Light.


This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Laws Worth Following

  1. janehinrichs says:

    SO interesting! And I appreciate reading this from you since law is your chosen profession.

    • Tim says:

      Thanks, Jane. This type of legal theory gets interesting for me. Glad it’s not something that makes non law people’s eyes glaze over!

  2. Jeannie says:

    After reading your post, esp the sentence “there is so much more to law than what is posited by people,” I thought about the “purity culture” article you posted a day or two ago. That post made me think how often we have this fear-driven idea “We’ve GOT to make laws/rules, or everything will just go to h**l in a handbasket” — and then we trust in our ability to set and keep rules rather than trusting in God and His Spirit’s guidance. Now obviously we need laws to govern our society — but your post just reminded me that God is in control of our world and when the laws or legal decisions aren’t what we think they should be, that basic fact hasn’t changed.

  3. Tim, Are you old enough to remember the Clarence Thomas affirmation hearings? Do you remember how he was grilled by many lefties concerning his belief in “natural law”? It would be interesting to go back and read the transcripts. I am trying to recall and not sure if I am right but I think Biden gave him a pretty hard time.

  4. Tim, I do have different perspective. I believe God wants us to take charge in living out His kingdom here and now. He wants us to reflect His love, justice, mercy, etc here and now. Be the light of the world. We might be saying the same things. The reason why this makes me a bit uncomfortable:
    “God is in charge despite our desire to make rules to run the world.”

    …is because that perspective lends itself to someone (guru) interpreting what is supposed to be the indwelling Holy Spirit in us. God has given each true believer the tools we need to be the light of the world.
    Justice, mercy, compassion, love, etc. We can live these out now.

    • Tim says:

      I agree that we are to bear the fruit of the Spirit (Gal. 5) as we abide in Christ (Jn. 15), Lydia. We are to be light in the world to the glory of God. (Mt. 5:14-16.)

  5. I mentioned in the comments on another post that my husband was not a follower of Jesus when we married. My faith was on pilot light at the time. We were married almost five years before Todd came to believing faith in Jesus.

    In many conversations I’ve made the comment that if, before my husband came to faith, someone had been asked which of the two of us where a Christian, most people would have picked my husband because of his integrity and adherence to acting according to what is right. In other words, he lived according to Natural Law. I believe my husband is a fine example of what Paul meant when he stated, “They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts” (Romans 2:15a).

    • Tim says:

      This is a perfect example of God’s grace and common blessings on people even before they come to him in faith, Ellen.

Talk to me (or don't)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.